Good morning everyone,

I’m Daniel, and welcome to Table Stakes!

Here’s a look at today’s topics:

• Trump continues to spar with Canada on tariff threats

• Progress on Israeli Ceasefire

• Iran Unveils New Missile Facility

We got hundreds of emails, and we just dropped some merch after you all asked us to restock.
You can get it at our shop here.

Trump Takes A $55 Billion Dollar War On Canada

_{By: Daniel Murrah, Staff Writer for Atlas}

The United States and Canada share the world's largest bilateral trading relationship, a partnership that has fostered decades of mutual prosperity and economic integration. This carefully cultivated economic alliance now faces its greatest challenge as President-elect Trump threatens to impose a 25% tariff on all Canadian imports upon taking office. The scale of this relationship puts into stark relief what's at stake: Canada stands as one of America's largest trading partners, with American imports from Canada reaching an astronomical $419 Billion in 2023, according to the International Trade Administration.

Allies in Conflict

The interdependence runs deep in both directions, with Canada purchasing more U.S.-made goods than any other nation - approximately $320 billion in just the first eleven months of 2024 according to US census figures. This relationship transcends raw numbers; on a per-capita basis, Canadian consumers consistently purchase significantly more American goods than their U.S. counterparts buy Canadian products. The current U.S. trade deficit with Canada, standing at $55 billion in goods for the first eleven months of 2024 per US Dept. of Commerce figures, has become a point of contention in this growing confrontation, though economists argue this figure fails to capture the full scope of the bilateral economic relationship.

A Continental Fallout

The implementation of the threatened 25% tariffs would trigger an economic cascade affecting both nations with unprecedented severity. Economic forecasts paint a grim picture: a full-blown trade war could push both countries into recession, with Canada facing particularly dire consequences. According to Oxford Economics, Canadian GDP could contract by 2.5% by early 2026, while unemployment rates might surge to 8% by late 2025 - numbers that would represent the most severe economic downturn in recent Canadian history.

The impact on inflation would be equally devastating, with Canadian rates potentially soaring to 7.2% according to the same source, threatening to erode purchasing power and savings across the country. American consumers wouldn't be spared either, as gas prices are projected to rise by 30 to 70 cents per gallon according to Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, adding significant costs to daily life. The human cost in terms of employment is equally sobering – Oxford estimates that Canada could lose 150,000 jobs, while the United States faces a projected loss of 344,900 positions in the long term according to the Tax Foundation.

Particularly vulnerable are Canada's auto, energy, and heavy manufacturing sectors, which have built complex supply chains and industrial partnerships across the border over decades. While proponents of the tariffs point to potential government revenue – estimated at $1.2 trillion by the Tax Foundation for the U.S. from 2025 through 2034 - these gains would likely be dwarfed by the broader economic damage inflicted on both nations. Canada's consideration of using potential tariff revenues for tax breaks or direct transfers to households represents an attempt to mitigate domestic economic pain, but such measures would do little to address the fundamental damage to North American economic integration.

Global Implications

The ripple effects of this trade dispute extend far beyond North America's borders, threatening to reshape global trade patterns and diplomatic relationships. The USMCA pact, scheduled for renewal in 2026, faces unprecedented uncertainty as these tensions escalate. While some strategists suggest the tariffs could serve as leverage to negotiate concessions on longstanding trade and immigration concerns, this approach risks fracturing decades of carefully cultivated diplomatic relations between the allies. The potential for this bilateral dispute to trigger wider international trade conflicts cannot be understated, as other nations watch and potentially recalibrate their own trade policies in response. The prospect of using tariffs as negotiating tools introduces additional complexity to an already fraught situation, potentially setting dangerous precedents for international trade relations.

Canada's preparation of retaliatory measures, including a comprehensive list of tariffs on American goods, shows a concerning mutual willingness to engage in a protracted economic battle that neither side can truly win. The deterioration of U.S.-Canada economic relations could mark the beginning of a broader restructuring of global trade relationships, with implications far beyond North America's borders, potentially triggering a domino effect of protectionist measures worldwide.

Israeli Ceasefire Progress: What Lies Ahead

_{By: Daniel Murrah, Staff Writer for Atlas}

As the January 20th presidential transition approaches, the landscape of Israeli-Hamas negotiations has taken on new urgency, with both outgoing and incoming administrations working in parallel to secure a breakthrough deal. The diplomatic dance has intensified following President-elect Donald Trump's stark warning of "hell to pay" if hostages remain in captivity beyond his inauguration, creating an unprecedented environment of dual-track diplomacy.

The convergence of Trump envoy Steve Witkoff's meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and ongoing efforts by the Biden administration has injected fresh momentum into the peace process. Secretary of State Antony Blinken's recent assertion that an agreement is "very close" reflects this renewed optimism, though the path forward remains complex and fraught with challenges.

In a significant development, Netanyahu has dispatched high-level security officials to Qatar, including Mossad director David Barnea and Shin Bet leadership, signaling Israel's serious commitment to reaching an agreement. This move comes as Hamas has indicated its readiness to release 34 Israeli captives as part of a potential deal, matching the specific number of hostages Israel seeks to have freed, including two U.S.-Israeli dual citizens.

The Delicate Balance of Demands and Concessions

The ongoing negotiations in Doha have reached a critical phase, with multiple parties working toward an agreement that could secure the release of approximately one-third of the remaining hostages in Gaza. However, the talks face substantial hurdles, primarily centered around Hamas's insistence on a definitive conflict end date and complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.

Hamas maintains specific demands that add layers of complexity to the negotiations. These include calls for immediate cessation of hostilities or, at minimum, a firm commitment to end fighting within an agreed timeframe. Their position also encompasses the withdrawal of Israeli troops and the return of displaced Palestinians to their homes, conditions that Israel has approached with careful consideration.

The Israeli position remains nuanced. While maintaining their commitment to neutralizing Hamas's military capabilities, Israeli negotiators have shown openness to a phased ceasefire approach. According to media reports, a potential deal currently under discussion would involve a six to seven-week temporary ceasefire, though relatives of Israeli hostages are pushing for a more comprehensive agreement that would secure the release of all captives and bring an end to the broader conflict.

Humanitarian Crisis and Domestic Pressures

The urgency of these negotiations is underscored by the devastating humanitarian toll of the conflict. The Gaza Health Ministry has reported over 46,000 Palestinian casualties, with the majority being women and children. This mounting human cost has intensified international pressure for a resolution, with foreign ambassadors to Israel joining the growing chorus of voices calling for a ceasefire agreement.

Within Israel, Netanyahu faces increasing domestic pressure from hostage families and regular protests in Tel Aviv demanding a deal. The recovery of two hostages' bodies in recent days has only heightened these concerns, with Hamas acknowledging uncertainty about the status of remaining captives after months of heavy fighting. The toll on Israeli forces has also continued to mount, with the military announcing the deaths of four soldiers in northern Gaza, bringing the total military casualties to at least 400 since the conflict began.

The Race Against Time

As the January 20th deadline approaches, the deliberations in Qatar, mediated by U.S., Egyptian, and Qatari officials, have taken on heightened significance. Trump's incoming Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, expressed optimism about the negotiations during a press conference at Mar-a-Lago, stating, "We're making a lot of progress," while carefully avoiding detailed discussion of potential impediments to a deal.

The involvement of both Israeli security chiefs and high-level diplomatic teams in Doha suggests all parties recognize the gravity of this moment and the potential consequences of failing to reach an agreement before the transfer of power in Washington. The convergence of mounting casualties, international pressure, and the impending U.S. administration change has created what many diplomats view as a crucial window for achieving a breakthrough.

Looking Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities

Despite the optimistic signals from various parties, significant obstacles remain. Previous rounds of negotiations have been hampered by Netanyahu's repeated declarations against a permanent truce and the introduction of new demands. Hamas's insistence on a comprehensive agreement that addresses both immediate humanitarian concerns and longer-term political objectives continues to present challenges for negotiators.

The presence of both outgoing and incoming U.S. administration representatives in the diplomatic process adds a unique dynamic to the negotiations. This unusual arrangement could either facilitate a smoother transition in the peace process or complicate decision-making as different approaches and priorities come into play.

The situation remains fluid, with both hope and skepticism coloring the diplomatic landscape. As outgoing U.S. Ambassador Jack Lew noted at a recent Tel Aviv rally, "We join together in the hope that the talks in Doha succeed. We're encouraged by the news today, but we know we can't stop." This sentiment captures the delicate balance between optimism and realism that characterizes the current state of negotiations, as all parties work against time to achieve a breakthrough before the presidential transition adds another layer of complexity to an already challenging diplomatic process.

New Iranian Missile Weapons Facility Breakdown

_{By: Daniel Murrah, Staff Writer for Atlas}

Iran has revealed a massive new underground missile storage facility, with military officials likening it to a "dormant volcano" buried deep within the earth. The sprawling complex houses dozens of missiles of various types and capabilities, making it a major expansion of Iran's military infrastructure. This facility has already seen active use, playing a crucial role in Iran's military operations against Israel in both April and October 2024.

The unveiling comes amid heightened regional tensions and demonstrates Iran's determination to maintain and protect its strategic missile forces. Such hardened underground facilities significantly complicate potential enemy targeting and ensure Iran can maintain operational capability even under severe attack. The extensive network of tunnels and storage areas suggests years of careful planning and construction, with Iran quietly building up this critical military asset while international attention focused elsewhere.

Breaking New Ground

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has announced major progress in its missile program, including the development of what they term "new special missiles." While keeping specific capabilities classified, Iran's missile arsenal already includes an array of short- and medium-range ballistic missiles that can strike targets across the Middle East. A key advancement has been the expansion of solid-fuel missile technology, with current systems achieving ranges up to 1,000 kilometers and some potentially reaching 1,400 kilometers.

The Sajjil program stands out as particularly significant, producing solid-fuel systems that are more compact and faster to deploy than traditional liquid-fuel missiles. These solid-fuel rockets can be prepared for launch more quickly and maintained in ready status for longer periods, giving military commanders greater flexibility in crisis situations. The program highlights Iran's growing domestic defense industry and its ability to push forward with advanced military technology despite international restrictions.

Regional and Global Response

Iran's missile developments coincide with a dramatic increase in its nuclear program, specifically the production of uranium enriched to 60% U-235 - just short of weapons-grade material. This combination of advancing missile technology and nuclear capability has sparked serious concern among neighboring countries and world powers.

Recent military exercises showcase Iran's growing confidence, including the Eqtedar 1403 drills near the Natanz nuclear facility and massive Basij force exercises involving 110,000 participants in Tehran. The expiration of UN Security Council Resolution 2231's missile restrictions in October 2023 removed key legal barriers to Iran's missile program, though the U.S. and allies continue to voice strong opposition to these developments. Military officials in Tehran have announced plans to unveil additional underground missile and drone facilities, suggesting this is just the beginning of a larger strategic expansion.

These moves are reshaping the military balance in the Middle East, forcing neighboring states to reassess their defense policies and pushing global powers to develop new strategies for maintaining regional stability. The combination of sophisticated missiles, hardened storage facilities, and potential nuclear capabilities presents a complex challenge that will likely dominate international security discussions in the coming years.

Stories you may have missed.

• 16 Dead, 16 Missing after weeklong fires in California

• Trump aide floats push for Ukraine to lower conscription age

• Chinese Yuan hits 16 month low as Trump’s tariffs loom

Interested in more from Atlas?

🌐Atlas Technologies: We are building world class OSINT technology that unifies the intelligence cycle by automating data collection, intelligence production and delivery to key stakeholders, all aligned with your priority intelligence requirements (PIRs). If you want to learn more, check out our website.

🛒Merch Store: Visit our merch store to shop our latest gear.

📰Newsletters: Check out our other publications to stay on top of the news and get insights from intelligence professionals.

• The Public Daily Briefing

• Apolitical 

• Table Stakes

• The BLUF 

• The Situation Room

If you'd like to get involved with Atlas, please contact us with your experience or ideas. If you're a solid fit, we'll be in touch.

Advertise with us || Contact Us

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2025 Atlas.1A