Table Stakes - January 27th

Good morning everyone,

I’m Daniel, and welcome to Table Stakes!

Here’s a look at today’s topics:

• Colombia, and the first realized tariff war under the 2nd Trump admin

• BRICs welcomes new member, Nigeria

• The US holds its first joint naval drill of 2025 w/ the Philippines

We got hundreds of emails, and we just dropped some merch after you all asked us to restock.
You can get it at our shop here.

Retaliation Threatened, Retaliation Came

_{By: Daniel Murrah, Staff Writer for Atlas}

The latest international trade dispute erupted unexpectedly when Colombia refused to accept two U.S. military flights carrying deported Colombian nationals. President Gustavo Petro's administration took a stance against what it characterized by Colombian officials as dehumanizing treatment of migrants, specifically demanding that deportees be transported via civilian aircraft rather than military transport. This seemingly procedural dispute quickly escalated into a full-blown diplomatic rift, laying bare the underlying tensions in U.S.-Colombian relations.

Petro's position centered on human rights concerns, arguing that the use of military aircraft for deportations transformed what should be an administrative process into a traumatic experience for those involved. This stance directly challenged the Trump administration's hardline approach to immigration enforcement, setting the stage for a confrontation between two leaders known for their unwavering positions.

Trump's Swift and Severe Response

The response from the Trump administration was both immediate and severe. In a move that shocked international observers, President Trump announced sweeping 25% emergency tariffs on all Colombian imports, with a threat to increase these tariffs to 50% within just one week if Colombia didn't reverse its position. The economic measures weren't limited to tariffs alone – they included visa revocations for Colombian government officials, targeted travel bans, and enhanced inspections of Colombian goods and nationals entering the United States.

The scope and speed of these punitive measures demonstrated Trump's willingness to use economic leverage as a tool of immigration policy. The tariffs targeted Colombia's most vital export sectors, including oil, coffee, gold, flowers, and minerals – industries that form the backbone of Colombia's export economy and its trade relationship with the United States.

Economic Implications and Market Response

The economic stakes in this dispute are substantial. The United States stands as Colombia's largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching $53 billion in 2022. The sudden imposition of tariffs threatened to unravel decades of economic cooperation and integration between the two nations.

Market analysts immediately predicted significant disruptions. Colombia's energy sector, which exports approximately 215,000 barrels of crude oil daily to the United States, faced particular vulnerability. The tariffs threatened to disrupt this crucial supply chain, with potential ripple effects throughout both economies. American consumers faced the prospect of higher prices, particularly for Colombian coffee, while Colombia risked substantial export revenue losses that could trigger broader economic instability in the region.

Colombia's Counter-Response

In what initially appeared to be a concession, Colombia offered to use its presidential plane to help repatriate deportees from the United States. However, this apparent de-escalation proved short-lived. In a dramatic counter-move, President Petro announced his own set of retaliatory measures, ordering a 25% increase in import tariffs on U.S. goods.

Petro's response, announced via social media platform X, included not just tariffs but also a strategic pivot toward domestic production. He declared that American products facing price increases within Colombia's national economy would be replaced by domestic alternatives, with government support for this transition. This move signaled Colombia's willingness to endure short-term economic pain in pursuit of greater economic independence and less acceptance of US dictates.

Broader Geopolitical Implications

This confrontation reveals deeper shifts in the geopolitical landscape of the Americas. Under Petro's leadership, Colombia has begun charting a more independent foreign policy course, despite its historical position as one of the United States' closest Latin American allies. This evolution includes pursuing closer ties with China and demonstrating greater ideological independence from Washington's influence.

The dispute has become a potential rallying point for regional resistance to U.S. policies. Petro's defiance could inspire other Latin American nations to adopt similar positions, potentially complicating U.S. immigration enforcement efforts throughout the region. Domestically, his stance has strengthened his political position, casting him as a leader willing to stand up to perceived U.S. overreach.

Market Impact and Economic Uncertainties

The financial markets' reaction to the escalating tensions was immediate and significant. Colombian assets faced the prospect of a substantial downturn, with traders caught off guard by the sudden announcement of U.S. tariffs. The ripple effects extended beyond Colombia, with other Latin American currencies, including the Mexican peso, experiencing increased volatility amid fears of similar U.S. actions against other countries.

Economic experts, including Daniel Velandia, chief economist at Credicorp Capital Colombia, predicted a weakening of the Colombian peso against the dollar and warned of potential recession risks in an "extreme scenario." The rare nature of the situation left analysts struggling to predict the full scope of potential economic damage.

Looking Forward

The Colombia-U.S. tariff dispute represents more than a simple trade disagreement – it marks a significant test of changing power dynamics in the Western Hemisphere. Traditional relationships are being reevaluated as smaller nations demonstrate increasing willingness to challenge U.S. policies, even at significant economic cost.

The outcome of this confrontation could have lasting implications for international migration policies, human rights considerations, and the broader landscape of diplomatic relations in the Americas. It also serves as a potential preview of future trade disputes, particularly as the Trump administration signals its readiness to use aggressive economic measures to achieve policy goals.

As both leaders maintain their positions, the future of U.S.-Colombian relations remains uncertain. The dispute demonstrates how quickly seemingly minor diplomatic disagreements can escalate into full-blown economic confrontations in today's interconnected world. Whether this crisis leads to a new equilibrium in U.S.-Latin American relations or marks the beginning of a more confrontational era remains to be seen.

Subscribe to Table Stakes to read the rest.