Table Stakes - March 24th

Good morning everyone,

I’m Daniel, and welcome to Table Stakes!

Here’s a look at today’s topics:

• Rubio to Venezuela: Comply, or Get Sanctioned

• Zelensky & Trump Talks Now Revolve Around Ukrainian Power Plant

• Russian Return To Olympics Now More Likely

We got hundreds of emails, and we just dropped some merch after you all asked us to restock. All profits go towards the LA Firefighters Foundation
You can get it at our shop here.

Rubio to Venezuela: Comply, or Get Sanctioned

_{By: Daniel Murrah, Staff Writer for Atlas}

In an escalation of diplomatic pressure, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has issued a warning to Venezuela: accept the repatriation of its citizens deported from the United States or face "severe and escalating" sanctions. The ultimatum comes as the Trump administration intensifies its focus on immigration enforcement and border control, with Venezuela caught in the crosshairs of a hardening U.S. foreign policy approach.

“Severe and Escalating”

Rubio's unambiguous message to Caracas solidified the US’s position that Venezuela has a duty to receive its citizens without question or discussion. This posture captures the Trump administration's larger approach to boost deportations of immigrants without legal status by leveraging economic power to gain compliance from other countries.

The confrontation signals still another turning point in the already tense relationship between Washington and Caracas. Under President Nicolás Maduro, the Venezuelan government first opposed allowing deportation flights, characterizing the recent repatriation of Venezuelan citizens to El Salvador as a "vulgar kidnapping" and a human rights infringement.

For Venezuela, which is already suffering under the weight of current U.S. sanctions, the threat arrives at a particularly challenging point. Further damaging Venezuela's economy, the Trump government recently canceled Chevron's authorization to export Venezuelan oil, therefore depriving the cash-strapped country of a major foreign trade source.

Further adding to the strain is the Trump administration's termination of a temporary residency program meant to safeguard about 350,000 Venezuelan immigrants residing in the United States. This change in policy has made many Venezuelans vulnerable to deportation and strained the already delicate bilateral relationship.

Under Trump, the impasse over repatriation reflects a larger change in U.S. foreign policy marked by a transactional strategy using diplomatic and economic clout to get concessions from other countries. Critics contend this approach gives quick political objectives top priority above long-term diplomatic ties and humanitarian concerns. Proponents argue it’s the only way to secure American interests.

Humanitarian Concerns

Behind the diplomatic wrangling lies a humanitarian catastrophe of staggering proportions. Venezuela's economic collapse has triggered what many consider the Western Hemisphere's worst humanitarian crisis in recent memory, driving more than 7 million people to flee the country since 2015.

Shortages of basic commodities in Venezuela have already been exacerbated by existing sanctions. Affecting hundreds of thousands of vulnerable individuals, including those with HIV, cancer, and those on dialysis treatment, medical supplies and drugs remain rare. With about 9 million Venezuelans suffering food insecurity, the nation's capacity to import food has been drastically diminished, resulting in general hunger and malnutrition.

The possibility of more sanctions begs major questions regarding the ongoing degradation of living conditions for the Venezuelan people. Opponents of the sanctions program contend that while failing to reach its declared political goals, economic restrictions have disproportionately affected the most vulnerable sections of the society.

Overcompliance has exacerbated these issues. Facing possible fines for unintentionally breaching U.S. sanctions, several banks and businesses have totally pulled out of the Venezuelan market. This has further isolated Venezuela from the world economy by erecting further obstacles to humanitarian relief and legal business activities.

For those who might be deported from the United States, returning to their own country carries great dangers. Human rights groups have recorded rampant violations of Venezuelan human rights including extrajudicial murders, torture, and arbitrary incarceration. Deporting Venezuelan immigrants back to their native nation, critics contend, may subject them to governmental persecution and other human rights abuses.

Venezuela has now consented to start accepting repatriation flights in spite of these reservations. This choice marks a major compromise from the Maduro regime, most likely motivated by concern of more economic pressure that would compromise its fragile grasp for power.

Political Pressures

The repatriation issue emphasizes the difficult task of juggling political pressure against humanitarian concerns in American foreign policy toward Venezuela. Proponents of sanctions claim they are required to pressure the Maduro government to solve democratic shortcomings and violations of human rights, therefore isolating corrupt officials without affecting the general population.

Critics respond that these economic restrictions directly cause great misery among the Venezuelan people.

Emphasizing food, medicine, and other basic needs, the international community—including the United Nations and other non-governmental organizations—has regularly pushed for more humanitarian assistance to Venezuela. But the more general economic isolation induced by sanctions has hindered the efficacy of these initiatives.

Looking ahead, political negotiations and humanitarian concerns could affect the Venezuelan government's openness to accept repatriation planes. Growing calls for a review of U.S. sanctions to guarantee they do not aggravate the humanitarian situation while keeping pressure on the Maduro government are still possible.

Subscribe to Table Stakes to read the rest.