Table Stakes - March 2nd

Good morning everyone,

I’m Daniel, and welcome to Table Stakes!

Here’s a look at today’s topics:

  • UK-France Led Peace Deal for Ukraine is Released

  • Israel Suspends Aid to Gaza

  • UN Chief Warns That Severe US Aid Cuts Will Do Great Damage

We got hundreds of emails, and we just dropped some merch after you all asked us to restock. All profits go towards the LA Firefighters Foundation
You can get it at our shop here.

UK-France Led Peace Deal for Ukraine is Released

Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer, right, and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, left, shake hands during a meeting at 10 Downing Street in London, England, on Saturday, March 1, 2025. Photo - Peter Nicholls/AP

By: Daniel Murrah, Staff Writer for Atlas

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Sunday that the United Kingdom, France, and Ukraine have agreed to collaborate on a comprehensive ceasefire plan aimed at ending the protracted Russia-Ukraine conflict. This European-led initiative comes at a critical juncture, following a notably tense meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House on February 28, 2025.

Filling the Gap

The timing of the announcement is not random; it immediately follows a heated meeting between Zelenskyy and U.S. President Trump which left the future of American support for Ukraine in question. Starmer, who is convening a meeting in London bringing together European leaders, stressed that the final plan will still be handed to the United States for additional review.

"The primary goal remains achieving a sustainable ceasefire and establishing long-term peace in Ukraine," Starmer said during the session. While addressing the continuing crisis, the London conference also brought European leaders together to increase their cooperation and cohesion. A crucial part of these discussions is the possible deployment of a European military force to help attempts at ceasefire implementation to Ukraine, indicating Europe's readiness to assume more responsibility for regional security issues.

With European leaders also positioned as potential mediators between the tense US-Ukraine relationship, this ceasefire effort reflects rising European diplomatic aggressiveness. The current diplomatic tensions have hindered international attempts to resolve the crisis, making this European-led approach even more important as an attempt to close the widening divide between Ukraine and her American supporters.

A Shifting Trans-Atlantic

Due to its broad consequences for US influence in the area, the ceasefire plan represents a possible turning point in European diplomatic dynamics. This project shows growing European readiness to handle regional security issues, a development consistent with long-standing US demands that Europe assume more responsibility for its own security concerns.

Regarding the security architecture of the continent, European leaders are jumping on an opportunity to expand their own influence to pursue their own interests without having to rely on the United States. Especially in view of changing US goals and commitment levels, the project shows a growing demand for European strategic autonomy. Beyond diplomatic initiatives, this need for more self-reliance could influence defense budgets and priorities, therefore influencing US defense exports and economic interests in the area.

From a US vantage point, this European-led project offers possibilities as well as difficulties. Reduced European reliance may, on one side, free the United States to focus resources on other world concerns, like the Indo-Pacific region. Consistent emphasis on the need of European partners to raise their defense capability and expenditure by the Biden and Trump administrations has made this development maybe in line with more general US strategic objectives.

But a more autonomous Europe might also result in US strategic dominance in the region declining. Different approaches to the Ukraine situation might possibly put NATO unity under pressure at a pivotal point. Dependency on US military technology may lessen over time as European countries may build their own defense industrial base, hence changing the balance of transatlantic relations.

Now, the United States must make important choices on how to interact with this European-led initiative while maintaining influence. This might call for a review of US military posture and commitments in Europe as well as a well calibrated diplomatic approach balancing support for Ukraine with more general strategic goals.

Challenges and Next Steps

The three main countries engaged in this process now have to create a thorough ceasefire plan. Once developed, this strategy will be given to the United States for review with hopes of getting American assistance and participation in preserving post-war stability.

Though this program has great potential, the ceasefire proposal faces major obstacles. Most immediately, the diplomatic team has to help to heal the recent divide between the United States and Ukraine. The criticism of President Zelenskyy by President Trump, as well as Zelenskyy’s response, have generated tensions that need serious attention as the strategy unfolds.

Ensuring Russian cooperation with any possible truce agreement offers still another difficult challenge. Previous efforts at creating long-lasting cease-fires in the area have often fallen apart, which casts doubt on international monitoring and enforcement systems. Though specifics are yet unknown, the European military contingent under discussion at the London meeting might help to monitor and enforce ceasefire requirements.

Coordinating a consistent European response to the conflict and its conclusion offers another set of difficulties. Although the UK, France, and Ukraine are spearheading this initiative, effectively implementing any ceasefire plan will depend on more general backing among European countries, many of whom have different degrees of commitment and different strategic agendas about the crisis. Furthermore, there appear to be major differences in American and European priorities at this point in the war. European leaders are mainly focused on territory reparation and Ukrainian interests beyond peace, while Trump wants to simply end the fighting and return to focusing on American interests.

The success of the proposal depends on ongoing diplomatic efforts to preserve US engagement and support. Although European countries are showing more autonomy in handling the crisis, a durable solution most certainly calls for some degree of US support. While they are preparing for scenarios with different degrees of American involvement, European leaders are deliberately positioning themselves as peacemakers between the US and Ukraine.

For Ukraine, this European-led project offers a possible road to peace despite a rocky relationship with the United States. By helping to create the ceasefire strategy, President Zelenskyy is leading his country through its greatest ever existential threat.

Subscribe to Table Stakes to read the rest.

Every Monday Morning, get a recap of the week’s events from countries on the main stage. Featuring news & analysis into new policy, military affairs, and international relations on the worlds stage.

Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.

A subscription gets you:

  • • Lifetime Rizz

Reply

or to participate.