Table Stakes - October 6th

Good morning everyone,

I’m Atlas, and welcome to Table Stakes! We are releasing something very special soon so keep a lookout!

Here’s a look at today’s topics:

• UK Takes Restrictions on Palestinian Protests

• Trump Focuses On Domestic Soybean Production W/ Tariff Revenue

• Indonesian Building Collapse Death Toll Rises To 49

UK Takes Restrictions on Palestinian Protests

_{By: Atlas}

The U.K. government said it will give police stronger powers to restrict repeated protests after nearly 500 people were arrested at a central London demonstration in support of the proscribed group Palestine Action. The Home Office outlined a plan to let senior officers consider the “cumulative impact” of frequent demonstrations when setting conditions on marches and static protests. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the measure is intended to balance the right to protest with the right of others to live without fear, citing repeated large-scale events that have unsettled parts of the public.

What changed

Under the proposal, police will be able to impose conditions—including relocating an event, limiting duration, or otherwise altering protest logistics—by weighing prior protests at the same site and their combined effect on local communities. Ministers also said they would review existing public-order law to ensure powers are “sufficient and being applied consistently,” with specific reference to Sections 12 and 14 of the Public Order Act 1986, which govern conditions on processions and assemblies. The Home Office framed the move as a targeted expansion of existing authority rather than a blanket ban on protest.

Officials emphasized that current law already allows bans in limited circumstances, but said repeated mass events in the same locations have strained policing and contributed to community tensions. The change is designed to codify the ability to account for repetition and scale when setting conditions, including instructing organizers to use alternative venues where appropriate. Mahmood underlined that the right to protest remains a “fundamental freedom,” while adding that responsibilities accompany that right when local residents feel intimidated by persistent disruption.

Events leading to the decision

The announcement followed a day of coordinated demonstrations that went ahead despite requests from police and national leaders to postpone after a deadly attack outside a Manchester synagogue. The Metropolitan Police said almost 500 people were detained in Trafalgar Square at a protest billed as a “Lift the Ban” vigil opposing the government’s designation of Palestine Action as a terrorist organization. Many arrests were for suspected support of the banned group, including participants who sat silently holding signs. Organizers said around 1,000 people took part in the London action.

Protests linked to the Gaza war have been held at regular intervals nationwide since late 2023. Authorities say the majority have been peaceful, but they also point to arrests for suspected offenses related to proscribed organizations and to concerns expressed by Jewish community leaders about safety and harassment. Police have deployed additional officers to synagogues and other sites since the attack in Manchester, while also dedicating resources to manage large gatherings in London and elsewhere.

The London event that triggered the new announcement centered on the government’s proscription of Palestine Action, a direct-action network whose members have targeted facilities with links to Israel’s defense sector. With the proscription in place, public support for the group can constitute a criminal offense. Police said they detained hundreds of protesters at the Trafalgar Square vigil, and separate arrests occurred during a banner action on Westminster Bridge.

How policing will apply the powers

Senior officers would be able to assess repeated protests in a given location as a single continuum when determining conditions, rather than evaluating each event in isolation. In practice, that means prior disruption, resource demands, and community impact could justify moving a demonstration, capping its length, or setting additional requirements to limit knock-on effects. The Home Office said the intention is to protect both free expression and public safety, acknowledging that frequent mass gatherings in the same areas can complicate routine policing and heighten local tensions.

Police officials have highlighted the operational toll of continual large-scale events, noting the need to cancel rest days, redeploy units, and sustain visible patrols around sensitive sites. The Metropolitan Police Federation described officers as “physically exhausted,” particularly when demonstrations overlap with terrorism-related operations or protection duties. Government statements added that the cumulative-impact standard would offer a clearer legal basis for setting proportionate conditions in those circumstances.

Mahmood told broadcasters the shift is not a blanket ban and reiterated that conditions must be lawful and proportionate. She also said existing powers would be reviewed for consistency across forces, including the threshold for prohibiting marches in exceptional cases. The government has not yet released draft statutory language or a timetable for legislative steps; ministers said the powers would be brought forward “as soon as possible.”

Political and legal responses

Reactions have broken along familiar lines. The president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews welcomed the move as a “necessary start,” arguing that repeated mass protests have left many in the community feeling unsafe and that the government should go further. The Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, backed the expansion while asking why it had taken so long and calling for stronger action against extremism.

Opposition also mobilized quickly. The group Defend Our Juries, which helped organize the Trafalgar Square vigil, labeled the plan an affront to free speech and assembly and signaled it would escalate its campaign against the proscription of Palestine Action. Amnesty International criticized the mass arrests of demonstrators who were seated and holding signs, calling the policing approach a breach of obligations to protect peaceful protest. Civil liberties advocates warned that a “cumulative impact” test risks granting overly broad discretion unless safeguards are explicit in law and guidance.

International and national outlets reported the same central facts: hundreds of arrests at the London vigil; a government pledge to arm police with a cumulative-impact standard; and explicit references by ministers to fear within the Jewish community following the Manchester attack. Wire services and national papers likewise noted that Palestine Action was proscribed in July after incidents targeting defense-linked sites.

On The Horizon

The implementation path runs through legislation or secondary regulations and accompanying operational guidance. Key details will include how “repeated protests” are defined, what documentation officers must compile to demonstrate cumulative impact, how conditions will be communicated to organizers, and what review or appeal mechanisms exist. Courts will likely scrutinize early uses of the power to test proportionality and compatibility with existing human-rights standards, including protections for peaceful assembly.

Operationally, police forces will be expected to publish clearer pre-event conditions where repetition is a factor and to coordinate with local authorities on transport disruptions, crowd management, and protective security around religious sites. Organizers may respond by rotating locations to avoid triggering cumulative assessments, while legal challenges may test the boundary between robust protest management and unlawful restriction. The government has said it will also examine whether current powers to ban marches outright are adequate and consistently applied across forces, signaling that further changes may follow the initial expansion.

The policy debate is therefore set on defined points: a government seeking to address repeated mass gatherings through a cumulative-impact test; police managing finite resources amid overlapping public-order and protective-security duties; and civil society groups contesting the balance between order and rights. The Home Office’s next steps—drafting, consultation, and guidance—will determine how quickly and in what form these restrictions enter daily practice.

Subscribe to Table Stakes to read the rest.